Compulsory Retirement Under Fundamental Rule 56(j) Cannot Coexist With Recent Merit-Based Promotions

Highlights of the Judgment:
- Examination of the legal parameters and limits of judicial review governing compulsory retirement under Fundamental Rule 56(j).
- Analysis of the logical contradiction when an officer is granted a merit-based promotion shortly before being prematurely retired as deadwood.
- Scrutiny of the evidentiary value of isolated, stale, or misconstrued entries in Annual Performance Appraisal Reports (APARs).
- Discussion on malice in law, arbitrary exercise of discretionary power, and the requirement of credible material for public interest retirement.