Procedural Lapses and Additional Evidence: Bombay High Court Remands ITAT Order Under Section 254(2)

Highlights of the Judgment:
- Examination of the scope of rectification powers under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
- Analysis of procedural requirements for submitting additional evidence under Rule 29 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963.
- Judicial scrutiny of the ITAT's failure to consider properly filed paper books and accompanying affidavits.
- Assessment of whether an affidavit seeking leave suffices in the absence of a separate formal petition.
- Principles governing the remand of matters for fresh adjudication on the admissibility of additional evidence.