Supreme Court Exercises Contempt Jurisdiction Against Sitting High Court Judge for Scandalizing Judiciary

Highlights of the Judgment:
- Examination of the Supreme Court's inherent jurisdiction under Article 129 to initiate suo-motu contempt proceedings against a sitting High Court judge.
- Judicial interpretation of criminal contempt focusing on scandalising the court and interference with the administration of justice.
- Analysis of whether constitutional immunity or the process of impeachment bars contempt action against superior court judges.
- Discussion on the scope of judicial accountability versus institutional independence in handling judicial misconduct.