HARISH ARORA AND ORS v. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOC AND ORS
Discusses principles of natural justice, statutory interpretation, judicial discipline, and abuse of power.
Court: Bombay High Court
Citation: 2025:BHC-AS:22586
Decision Date: 09-06-2025
List of Laws
Constitution of India, 1949; Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960; General Principles of Law
- Constitution of India, 1949: The judgment invokes Article 227 of the Constitution of India, under which the writ petition was instituted. The Court discusses the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 227, stating it should not interfere when efficacious alternative remedies are available, but notes exceptions. The Court also refers to Article 141, stating that it gives binding force to the law declared by constitutional courts. The judgment upholds the High Court's exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 despite an appellate remedy.
- Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: The judgment extensively discusses several sections of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 ("MCS Act"). Section 73 is mentioned in the context of a complaint filed before the Deputy Registrar, alleging irregularities in resolutions passed by the society. Section 77A is discussed in detail, concerning the appointment of an Administrator. The Court notes that before passing an order under Section 77A, the Registrar is ordinarily required to publish a notice. The Court also states that Section 77A is designed to deal with situations of vacuum or impasse in a society's management, and is not meant to be a punitive provision. Section 78 is discussed as empowering the Registrar to suspend or remove the entire committee for acts of collective failure or dereliction. Section 78A is discussed as empowering the Registrar to supersede the committee or remove any member thereof if statutory prerequisites are satisfied. Section 79A is central to the judgment. Section 79A(1) empowers the State Government to issue binding directions to cooperative societies. Section 79A(3) confers authority on the Registrar to take action in case of non-compliance with such directions, including disqualification of a committee member. The Court analyzes the scope of Section 79A(3), stating that the Registrar must first identify whether the responsibility to act was specifically placed upon the person concerned by the directive. Section 91 is mentioned as the section under which disputes regarding general body resolutions may be adjudicated by the Cooperative Court. Section 154 is discussed as providing an alternate statutory remedy via revision applications. The Court notes that revision under Section 154 is a remedy available as of right to an aggrieved person.
- General Principles of Law: The judgment extensively discusses the principles of natural justice, particularly the 'audi alteram partem' rule (right to be heard). The Court emphasizes that any order affecting civil rights or legal status must be preceded by notice and an opportunity of hearing. The judgment also discusses the principle of judicial discipline, obligating statutory authorities to follow binding judicial precedent. The judgment also discusses the doctrine of colourable exercise of power, stating that what cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly. The principle of "nemo judex in causa sua" (no person shall be a judge in his own cause) is also mentioned.
🔒 For Members Only