SHARANJEETKARU MASSASINGH SOKHI AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Discusses interpretation of statutes related to land acquisition and town planning, highlighting the importance of timely action.
Court: Bombay High Court
Citation: 2025:BHC-AUG:15849-DB
Decision Date: 13-06-2025
List of Laws
The Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act); Land Acquisition Act, 1894; General Principles of Law
- The Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act): The judgment extensively discusses Section 127 of the MRTP Act, focusing on the lapsing of land reservation due to the inaction of the respondents in acquiring the land despite a statutory notice from the petitioners. The court refers to the requirement under Section 127 that the land must be acquired within 10 years of the final development plan coming into force, failing which the reservation lapses upon service of notice by the landowner. The court also refers to Section 127(2) regarding the issuance of a Gazette notification about the lapsing of reservation. The judgment emphasizes that the steps taken by the authorities must be towards actual acquisition and not merely steps for acquisition. It cites the case of Girnar Traders Vrs. State of Maharashtra, reported in (2007) 7 SCC 555, to support the interpretation of Section 127. The court also refers to Section 126, which provides for the acquisition of land under the MRTP Act, and its relationship with Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act. The court notes that the legislature has deliberately used the word "steps" (in plural) in Section 127, indicating that multiple steps are required for the acquisition of land.
- Land Acquisition Act, 1894: The judgment refers to Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act (LA Act) in conjunction with Section 126 of the MRTP Act. It states that Clause (c) of Section 126(1) of the MRTP Act merely provides a mode by which the State Government can be requested for the acquisition of land under Section 6 of the LA Act. The court clarifies that merely making an application to the State Government for acquisition does not constitute a step towards acquisition. The steps towards acquisition commence when the State Government permits the acquisition and publishes the declaration under Section 6 of the LA Act.
- General Principles of Law: The judgment discusses the principle that authorities cannot defeat the purpose and object of a scheme of acquisition by merely moving an application requesting the Government to acquire the land. It emphasizes that the steps taken must result in the actual commencement of land acquisition. The judgment also implicitly touches upon the principle of timely action, highlighting that the authorities failed to take necessary steps within the prescribed time frame, leading to the lapsing of the reservation. The concept of res integra is mentioned, indicating that the issue in the petition is no longer a novel one due to prior judicial pronouncements.
🔒 For Members Only