SANDEEP MARUTI RASKAR v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CUM DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER
Discusses principles of electoral law, natural justice, alternate remedies, and writ jurisdiction.
Court: Bombay High Court
Citation: 2025:BHC-AS:48719
Decision Date: 12-11-2025
List of Laws
Article 227 of the Constitution of India; The Representation of the People Act, 1950; The Registration of Electors Rules, 1960; The Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965
- Article 227 of the Constitution of India: The petition was filed under Article 227, which grants the High Court the power of superintendence over all courts and tribunals throughout the territories in relation to which it exercises jurisdiction. The petitioner used this article to challenge the legality, propriety, and correctness of an order passed by the District Collector/District Election Officer. The significance lies in the High Court's power to review decisions of lower authorities to ensure they act within their jurisdiction and according to law. The practical implication is that it allows individuals to seek judicial review of administrative decisions affecting their rights.
- The Representation of the People Act, 1950: Section 24: This section pertains to appeals related to orders of the electoral registration officer under Section 22 or 23. The judgment discusses the availability of an appeal under Section 24(b) to the Chief Electoral Officer and whether it constitutes an efficacious remedy. The court considers whether the existence of this alternate remedy precludes the writ court from exercising jurisdiction, especially given the impending deadline for filing nomination forms. The significance is in clarifying the hierarchy of remedies and the circumstances under which a writ petition can be entertained despite the availability of an alternate remedy. The practical implication is that it guides litigants on when to approach the High Court directly versus exhausting statutory appeals. Section 22: This section provides for the correction of entries in electoral rolls. The court notes that the deletion of the petitioner's name was an exercise of power under this section. The provision mandates that before deleting an entry based on a person ceasing to be ordinarily resident, the electoral registration officer must provide a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The significance lies in upholding principles of natural justice in electoral roll maintenance. The practical implication is that it reinforces the need for fair procedure in electoral processes. Section 24(b): The Election Commission argued that the petition was not maintainable because Section 24(b) provides an appeal to the Chief Electoral Officer. The court considered whether this remedy was efficacious, given the timeline for filing nominations. The significance lies in the court's assessment of the adequacy of alternate remedies before exercising writ jurisdiction. The practical implication is that it highlights the court's discretion to intervene when statutory remedies are impractical or ineffective.
- The Registration of Electors Rules, 1960: Rule 23: This rule provides for appeals from orders deciding claims and objections under Rules 20, 21, and 21-A to an appellate officer designated by the State Government. The judgment mentions that the appeal preferred by the petitioner was purportedly under Section 24 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, read with Rule 23 of these rules. The significance is in outlining the appellate mechanism for electoral roll disputes. The practical implication is that it informs individuals about the process for challenging decisions related to electoral roll entries. Rule 21-A: This rule pertains to the deletion of names from the electoral roll. The court notes that the deletion of the petitioner's name was in pursuance of the power under Section 22 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, and Rule 21-A of these rules. The significance is in specifying the procedure for deleting names from the electoral roll. The practical implication is that it ensures transparency and fairness in the electoral roll maintenance process.
- The Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965: Section 11: This section mandates that the electoral roll of the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, prepared under the Representation of the People Act, 1950, shall be the basis for the voters list for municipal elections. The court refers to this section to emphasize that the final electoral roll for the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly commands primacy. The significance is in establishing the link between the legislative assembly electoral roll and the municipal voters list. The practical implication is that it streamlines the process of preparing voters lists for municipal elections. Section 12: This section defines the right to vote, stating that every person whose name is in the list of voters maintained under Section 11 shall be qualified to vote. The court refers to this section to highlight that the petitioner loses the qualification of a voter if their name is not in the voters list. The significance is in defining the eligibility criteria for voting in municipal elections. The practical implication is that it clarifies who is entitled to vote in municipal elections.
🔒 For Members Only