THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, FOREST DEV'MENT CORP. v. SHRI TULASHIRAM RAMA KHUTADE
Regularization of Long-Serving Daily Wage Employees: Upholding Concurrent Findings of Unfair Labour Practices Under MRTU & PULP Act.
Court: Bombay High Court
Citation: 2025:BHC-AS:57672-DB
Decision Date: 24-12-2025
List of Laws
The Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Article 12 of the Constitution; The Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Section 25B of the Industrial Disputes Act
- Facts: The Divisional Manager, Forest Development Corporation, Nashik, appealed against a common judgment and order dated 13 June 2001, passed by a Single Judge on a batch of writ petitions. The original dispute arose from complaints filed by respondents (employees) under Section 28 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 ("MRTU & PULP Act"), alleging unfair labor practices. The employees, appointed as watchmen between 1977 and 1992, claimed they worked continuously for over 240 days each year and were entitled to regularization. The Forest Development Corporation argued it was registered under the Companies Act, not a State Government department, and lacked funds for regularization.
- Procedural Posture: The Industrial Court ruled in favor of the employees, finding the Forest Development Corporation guilty of unfair labor practices. The Single Judge upheld this decision in the writ petitions. The Divisional Manager then filed Letters Patent Appeals, which were initially dismissed for non-prosecution but later restored. The current judgment addresses these appeals.
- Issue: Did the Industrial Court and the Single Judge err in finding the Forest Development Corporation guilty of unfair labor practices and directing regularization of the employees, considering the Corporation's arguments regarding its status, lack of sanctioned posts, and the nature of the employment?
- Holding: No, the Letters Patent Appeals are dismissed. The concurrent findings of the Industrial Court and the Single Judge are upheld. The employees are entitled to regularization and associated benefits.
- Reasoning: The Court found that the employees had worked continuously for 15-20 years, fulfilling the requirement of 240 days of service each year. The Forest Development Corporation, despite being registered under the Companies Act, was deemed an undertaking of the Government of Maharashtra. The Court emphasized that the work performed by the employees was permanent and perennial. The Court rejected the argument that the absence of sanctioned posts precluded regularization, citing Section 30 of the MRTU & PULP Act, which empowers the court to grant declarations. The Court distinguished the cited Supreme Court precedents, finding them inapplicable to the facts of the case. The Court also noted that the State Government had regularized similarly situated employees in the past, further supporting the decision to uphold the regularization orders.
🔒 For Members Only