THE MAHARASHTRA STATE CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION LTD. v. SHRI. SUBHASH TUKARAM NIKAM
Mandatory Pre-Deposit for Gratuity Appeal: Interpretation of Section 7(7) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1971, and Jurisdictional Limits of Appellate Authority.
Court: Bombay High Court
Citation: 2025:BHC-KOL:3200
Decision Date: 01-12-2025
List of Laws
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1971; Section 7(7) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1971
- Facts: The Respondent-employee filed an application before the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1971, seeking gratuity from the Petitioner-employer. The Controlling Authority directed the Petitioner to pay Rs. 5,47,000/- with interest. The Petitioner filed an appeal before the Appellate Authority along with an application to condone the delay. The Appellate Authority condoned the delay. Subsequently, the Petitioner sought directions from the Appellate Authority to accept a demand draft for the gratuity amount, which was rejected by the Appellate Authority, citing Section 7(7) of the Act.
- Procedural Posture: The Petitioner challenged the order of the Appellate Authority before the High Court of Bombay in a writ petition. The Petitioner argued that the impugned order was without reasons and liable to be quashed. The Respondent contended that the appeal was not maintainable as the gratuity amount was not deposited as required under Section 7(7) of the Act at the time of filing the appeal.
- Issue: Whether the second proviso to Sub-section (7) of Section 7 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1971, mandates the deposit of the gratuity amount as ordered by the Authority before the admission of the appeal, and whether the Appellate Authority has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal if such deposit is not made within 120 days from the date of receipt of the order.
- Holding: Yes, the High Court held that the deposit of the gratuity amount as ordered by the Authority is a mandatory requirement under the second proviso to Sub-section (7) of Section 7 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1971, for the admission of an appeal. The Appellate Authority lacks jurisdiction to entertain an appeal if the deposit is not made within 120 days from the date of receipt of the order.
- Reasoning: The Court relied on the Division Bench decision in Pharma Base India Pvt. Ltd. and disagreed with the view of a Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court. The Court emphasized that the second proviso to Section 7(7) requires pre-deposit of the gratuity amount or production of a certificate of deposit at the time of presentation of the appeal. The Court stated that the payment or deposit of the gratuity amount cannot be postponed beyond 120 days, and the Appellate Authority has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal if such deposit is not made within this period. Since the Petitioner failed to deposit the amount within 120 days, they lost the right to have their appeal admitted.
🔒 For Members Only