Bombay High Court Mandates Timely Payment of Retiral Dues and Interest by BEST Undertaking
🔒 For Members Only
Case: SHIRISH GOVIND KETKAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT OF MAHARSHTRA
Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 30-06-2026
Law: Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, Constitution of India, Payment of Gratuity Act.
Highlights of the Judgment:
- Recognition of retiral dues as a statutory and legal entitlement rather than a bounty for ex-employees.
- Application of the "Model Employer" doctrine to statutory bodies and municipal corporations.
- Judicial interpretation of Article 21 regarding the right to timely pension as a facet of the right to life.
- Ruling on the impermissibility of using financial stringency as a defense for defaulting on terminal benefits.
- Awarding of interest at 9% per annum as compensation for the delayed disbursement of superannuation dues.
- Mandating advance financial planning and estimation for upcoming retirements to prevent systemic defaults.
- Analysis of the vicarious liability of the State for the constitutional failures of public sector undertakings.