Proof of Dispatch vs. Actual Delivery: Presumption of Service in Trademark Renewal Notices.
🔒 For Members Only
Case: Raju Patel through his constitute attorney Lalit Kumar v. The Registrar of Trade Marks Mumbai
Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 21-07-2026
Law: Trade Marks Act, General Clauses Act.
Highlights of the Judgment:
- Interpretation of Section 25(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, regarding the mandatory nature of renewal notices.
- Application of Rule 18 and Rule 58 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017, concerning the mode and proof of service.
- Analysis of the statutory presumption of service under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, 1897.
- Evidentiary value of an Outward Dispatch Register in proving the issuance of statutory notices.
- Judicial determination on whether proof of dispatch satisfies the requirement of "sending" notice versus proof of actual delivery.
- Discussion on the shifting burden of proof once the Registrar establishes proper addressing and posting.
- Legal standing of an assignee regarding trademark renewals and the responsibility of monitoring registration validity.