Section 9 Jurisdiction in Foreign-Seated Arbitrations and the Impact of Institutional Emergency Relief Rules
🔒 For Members Only
Case: MALANEY TRADING AND SERVICES LLP v. UZER MAKINA VE KALIP SANAYI A. S. AND 3 ORS
Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 07-07-2026
Law: Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Highlights of the Judgment:
- Interpretation of the Section 2(2) proviso regarding Section 9 applicability in foreign-seated arbitrations.
- Analysis of whether institutional emergency relief rules constitute an "agreement to the contrary" ousting court jurisdiction.
- Application of the "alter ego" doctrine to prevent circumvention of interim orders via subsidiary entities.
- Judicial distinction between domestic and foreign awards concerning their immediate enforceability as court decrees.
- The court's authority to mandate deposits of disputed sums to secure foreign arbitral awards.
- Examination of "implied waiver" of Section 9 jurisdiction in international commercial arbitration contexts.