Fatal Flaws in Dock Identification and Medical Contradictions Warranting Acquittal in Sexual Assault Case

Highlights of the Judgment:
- Detailed examination of the distinction between substantive dock identification and corroborative test identification parade evidence.
- Analysis of the fatal impact of failing to conduct dock identification during trial when the accused was unnamed in the FIR.
- Reconciliation of material discrepancies between medical evidence regarding the age of injuries and the alleged date of the incident.
- Commentary on the active duty of courts and public prosecutors under Section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, to prevent procedural lapses.