Regularization Rights of Long-Term Contractual Employees and the Illegality of Imposed Examinations

Highlights of the Judgment:
- Examination of the legality of denying regularization to long-serving contractual employees performing perennial duties.
- Application of the doctrine of legitimate expectation and the state's obligation as a model employer.
- Distinction between illegal back-door entries and irregular appointments made via open selection processes under Umadevi.
- Scrutiny of arbitrary administrative conditions requiring competitive examinations for regularization when peers were exempted.
- Enforcement of the equality mandate under Article 14 to prevent discriminatory yardsticks in public employment.