Sibling Dependency and the Tribunal's Duty to Award Just Compensation Under the Motor Vehicles Act

Highlights of the Judgment:
- Detailed examination of a sibling's entitlement to claim compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
- Distinction between the legal right to apply for compensation as a legal representative and the substantive test of dependency.
- Judicial interpretation clarifying that an individual's physical capacity to earn labor does not negate actual financial dependency.
- Application of landmark precedents regarding the wide scope of the term legal representative under Section 2(11) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
- Reiteration of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal's statutory obligation to award just compensation regardless of the initial claim amount.
- Calculation methodology for future prospects, multipliers, and appropriate salary deductions under established Supreme Court guidelines.